Archive

Tag Archives: Implementation Science

IMG_5491 (1)

Above: Manchester, UK

For those who picked up on the first post I hope that you took the time to go on to Sarah Knowles second and third posts on the topic. If not, then here are the links…

‘Science vs The Gap’

https://datapatientaction.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/three-cheers-for-implementation-science-2-science-vs-the-gap/

and, ‘You Make Me Want to be a Better Researcher’

https://datapatientaction.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/three-cheers-for-implementation-science-3-you-make-me-want-to-be-a-better-researcher/

Worth a read. I was lucky to meet Sarah and other members of the Greater Manchester NIHR CLAHRC on a visit last year. Sarah is a proper implementation scientist – I am not!

These posts are good for the uninitiated (i.e. those people who are thinking ‘what is implementation science anyway?’) and those wondering why I’m posting about it.

My favourite is Cheer #3 – probably the least well recognised and understood but for me the most important because it emphasises the two-way connection that should exist between clinical research and implementation science. It’s what takes implementation science from being an academic curiosity to a ‘thing’ that clinician scientists benefit from understanding and engaging with.